Maggots force plane back to gate in Atlanta
ATLANTA – Maggots falling from an overhead bin from a spoiled container of meat forced a US
Chaos at Conn. airport renews tarmac-rule debate
NEWARK, N.J. – Hundreds of passengers stuck for hours on a hot, dark plane at a Connecticut
First family wraps up packed Maine holiday
BAR HARBOR, Maine – President Barack Obama and the first family had an energetic weekend
Posted 04 18 2008 9:45PM
But, like the words of the song, it ain't necessarily so. Several factors could keep fares low, in Airfarewatchdog.com's opinion.
For one thing, to quote former Continental Airlines CEO Gordon Bethune speaking at a recent travel industry conference, with apologies to P.T. Barnum, "There's a sucker born every minute."
There's always some misguided soul who will want to start a new airline. (Ask any little boy what he wants to be when he grows up and he'll tell you a policeman, fireman, or pilot. And if he can't be a pilot, he'll probably want to run an airline.)
New low-cost airlines likely
This is especially true after periods of airline consolidation. When Pan Am disappeared and after American bought TWA, fares increased for a while on certain routes. But then we saw the creation and expansion of discount carriers - some sadly no longer with us or on the danger list - such as AirTran, Skybus, ATA, JetBlue, Spirit, Allegiant, Sun Country, USA3000, Frontier, Virgin America, and Southwest. The same thing probably will happen again.
So if consolidation leaves us with three or four major airlines and a handful of surviving low-cost carriers, another David Neeleman will emerge to launch another JetBlue. (Mr. Neeleman himself has left JetBlue and is building a new Brazil-based discount carrier.)
The fact is that, from the first scheduled flight on Jan. 1, 1914 to the present, the airline industry has never been particularly rational when it comes to the bottom line. Ask anyone who has been foolish enough to buy airline stocks.
Another factor to consider is that consolidation of the major airlines may not, in the end, ensure their survival. Thanks to aging fleets and expensive labor, they all have higher cost structures than the low-cost carriers. If we end up with Delta-Northwest, United-Continental, and American-US Airways as the remaining "Big Three," these airlines may become aviation dinosaurs, prey to existing and new low cost carriers.
This Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest scenario could keep airfares reasonably low.
Oil prices
Then there's the oil factor. Some industry analysts believe that $112 oil is a fluke, and that prices will eventually plummet, as they have in the past. That would encourage (or enable, if you're into psychotherapy) the next generation of discount-airline entrepreneurs.
Even so, the chances are we won't see many more of those crazy retaliatory, tit-for-tat, unadvertised hub-airport fare wars. That's when Delta would lower fares out of Northwest's hubs to ridiculously low levels and then Northwest would return the favor out of Delta's hubs a few hours later.
As Airfarewatchdog.com aficionados will recall, one Saturday morning a few years ago Delta lowered fares between all of its U.S. airports and Continental Airlines' hubs to $88 round-trip; and later that day Continental returned the favor by targeting Delta's hubs at the same $88 fare. This sort of irrational behavior may be history, and for the sake of all flight attendants surviving on food stamps, perhaps it should be.
Fees will increase
What we will see, however, is all those maddening extra fees going up and up. Pet-in-cabin fees, redeposit-frequent-flyer-mile fees, advance-seat-assignment fees, and all the others. Already, most major airlines now charge $25 for a second checked bag. I wouldn't be surprised if the next move is a fee for every checked bag.
Some airlines (United among them) will still refund the difference if a fare you have purchased goes down between the time you buy and the time you fly, without extracting a $100 ticket re-issue fee. But don't expect that to last, either. In fact, don't be surprised if airlines eliminate price-drop refunds altogether (as was the policy at now-defunct, you-buy-it-you-fly-it SkyBus).
What about international fares? There might be some good news here. The new "open skies" agreements, which allow foreign airlines more leeway to fly between the U.S. and foreign airports, may keep fares from spiking too terribly, and may also keep service levels from plunging.
In any event, let's face it: Even if airfares increase moderately, they'll still be an amazing bargain. Twenty years ago, you would have paid far more for an airline ticket, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than you do now. According to the Air Transport Association, admittedly an industry trade group, the inflation-adjusted cost of domestic air travel has dropped by 50 percent since deregulation in 1978, from 8 cents per mile to 4 cents per mile today.
Visit Aviation.com, the new one-stop destination for business fliers, commercial travelers, industry analysts and aviation buffs.
Related : AirTran , Continental Airlines , US Airways , Travel News , Aviation.com , Airline , Mergers , May , Not , Mean , Higher , Fares
- “Airline Mergers May Not Mean Higher Fares”